Case Study

Running head : CITY EASEMENT UTILITY LINEThe roost slip of Mr . Jonesconstructing a subdivision overthe backup city value argumentationAbstractThe urban center has every rightly to retrieve its ease utility take out . It can also require Mr . Jones to demolish the subdivision at his cost . The property proprietor can at go around recover his payments from Mr . Jones by a court of law , if not by shared agreement . The neighbor has no consider of damages on the basis of this episode . Since the matter comes below the jurisdiction of the submit courts , rather than Federal courts , Mr . Jones has to defend his eluding , if needed through with(predicate) State courtsCase of Mr . JonesEasement of urban center Utility line is occupy by Mr . Jones subdivision . The metropolis council has every right to tolerate the re flection of sub-division or for that matter to demolish the construction for get the succour utility line for the public .

level turned the cost of such demolishing work has to be borne by Mr . Jones or the property owner as the City routine Utility Department has observed in some cases ( Holly , 2008The City is threatening to sue Mr . Jones for fraud against Municipality Mr . Jones can not be charged with an act of fraud . It is true ignorance of law is no excuse (Babstock , 2009 ) But , what Mr . Jones has done can be be as an unwitting act of ignorance of the fact that the City easement utitlity line is und er the constructed areaThe owner of the subd! ivision...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper