.

Friday, March 29, 2019

Analysis Of Brave New World English Literature Essay

Analysis Of live on juvenile founding English Literature tryImagine a futuristic caller where natural birth is ancient and children argon decanted from test tubes. A society based on a prejudiced and strict caste system where Alphas rule and Epsilons are deliberately slip byn alcohol during their gestation period to inhibit their growth and intelligence. Where cozy promiscuity is accepted and encouraged, man those who practice monogamy and have deeps feelings for only if angiotensin-converting enzyme individual are ostracized. As Lenina aptly summarizes, e genuinelybody belongs to every one else and no one belongs to themselves (Huxley, 121). This horrifying dystopia is the saddle horse of Aldous Huxleys new age novel, Brave New sphere, where the main protagonists, Bernard Marx and John the Savage, defy social norm for a chance of freedom. Published in 1932, Huxleys novel satirizes issues not only render in the 30s but in todays modern society as well. inconsistency a mong people and technologys hold on the hatful are brought to light indoors the novel. However comical some sections seem to be at first, Huxleys authorized enjoyment was to draw light in how easy governments could control their the masses through psychological means while the public themselves are leftover illiterate or fully accept it just as in Brave New humans. Although the people of this controlled society seem genuinely glut with their lives, its due more to their ignorance and their soma than authentic happiness. Throughout the novel, Brave New World, the unifying idea that truth and happiness cannot coexists is prevalent in guild to achieve one, the early(a) must be sacrificed.SCHOLARLY ARTICLEA critical look into the eye of a critic can give in-depth analysis on a topic for which a reader mogul overlook. An word in Aldous Huxleys web site gives a very plenary investigation on Brave New World that breaks down and guesstimates the purpose of soma and its functio nality. As the critic states, Huxley was writing a satirical gentlemans gentleman of fiction, not scientific prophecy. Soma, viewed from scientific reality could be possible, but mostly have dangerous side effects and most unlikely to be approved by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration). It is something akin to drugs or alcohol, without the unfavorable side-effects. However, correspond to the article, taken in excess, soma acts as a respiratory downer making more of an opiate than a sort of clinically valuable mood-brightener. It is what separates spurious happiness from the harsh realities the infantile people of Huxleys dystopia are not abandoned to. The basis of the government depicted in Brave New World is centered around control and manipulation, making soma a very useful tool in silencing rebellious thoughts by placating the minds of the public. On the other hand, those who do not realise happiness are exiled into secret islands where they cannot disrupt or infect the minds of others. This in itself gives proof that soma is not all effective to all populations, all the time. People like Bernard, though feels the instant gratification that soma brings, finds he cannot keep it as others could. The article gives a very insightful look into the mystery drug and debunks any misconception that could arise from lack of understanding within the novel.STYLETHEMEThe limb of choice for the World Controllers is not nuclear bombs nor weaponry, but an artificial drug, soma. instilling fear and intimidation could only go so far and whitethorn cause resentment and dangerous thoughts of rebellion in the oppressed. However, subconscious condition and mind-altering drugs could produce the comparable effects, without the dangerous thoughts. In addition to patrimonial engineering, the soma drug is perhaps the most powerful weapon the World Controllers have in their arsenal. With these two, any problems before Ford have been for good eradicated from the minds of the everyday people.In the name of stability and happiness, as Mustapha Mond, one of Huxleys World Controllers states, the freedom of truth is sacrificed (Huxley, 225). Almost all of Huxleys characters, with the exception of the main protagonists Bernard and John, are content with having their soma, vicariously living through feelies, and living their mundane and ignorant lives never wanting more than what is given to them. Mond erroneously associates the lack of bother with genuine happiness. It seems only John the Savage understands that true joy is a result of knowing ones own self-worth and finding inner-satisfaction. John was filled with an intense, take up happiness after investing hard work into a system sculpture he made with his own hands (Huxley, 134). He entirely out of everyone else in civilized Britain could give testimony to feeling true happiness, and not the artificial one induced by the soma drug, because he is the only one who worked hard because he wanted to , and not because he was conditioned to do so.POEMThe concept of a futuristic dystopian society is popular through many working of prose. For example, Philena Pughs poem Fragments for the supply of Times Square the Fear of Neon, deals with a character who perceives himself to be the finishing of his kind. This mirrors Huxleys own character, John as well as drawing other parallels.Silence lies underneath the crackle and hum of the neon lights. The puddle adjacent my feet glistens crimson reflecting the words Restaurant and Lounge. A tribute to our pick up/take out society. Above buildings crowd out the sky exit a jailcell windowto see the stars through. My footsteps echo throughout the world and I realize that I am the last. My breathing grows labored- sending out a sharp, rasping sound to compete with the sputter-buzz conversation on the neon. My dim, twilight eyes srift shut and my final breath gurgles the dark phlegm of fearin the back of my throat. With the hollow thumpof c ranium meeting pavement, humanity is gone. And the neon lights burn brightly into eternity- crackling in timeto the winking stars.The fibber of Pughs poem and Huxleys John find themselves the last of their kind, with the narrator the last human, while John is the only one naturally conceived with civilized parents. They both find great tragedy in the world around them, feeling pin down and alone by what society becomes in their respective worlds. The two works of prose focuses on the struggle betwixt man and the society he is a part of and their failure to adapt or to conform leads to their demise. Driven to wildness by the horror of moral-less society around him, John cried out to deity and covered his eyes with his hands (Huxley, 259), drawing parallelism, the narrator of the poem is met with the same fate with the hollow thump of cranium meeting pavement, humanity is gone(Pugh). The setting of both works is in a dystopia that puts an emphasis on the expenditure of goods vers es the freedom of nature. Juxtaposing Pughs society in which buildings crowd out the sky go away a jailcell window to see the stars with the buildings themselves are made as a tribute to their pick up/take out society, and Huxleys World-Controlled civilized society condition the masses to hate the country but at the same time, condition them to love country sports one can see the similarities between the two dystopian societies. (Huxley, 23). These works built a society that ensures the using up of goods and/or transportation and the technology that drives it.

No comments:

Post a Comment