.

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

Critical-Thinking Questions: The Social Bond, Positive and Negative Reinforcement Essay

The Social Bond According to Dan Okada (2011), Hirschi combine the aspects of societal disorganization, labeling, differential association, containment, and anomie in order to propose the elements of the sociable bond. The bond contains four vital elements attachment, commitment, involvement, and belief (Okada, 2011, p. 42) all of which create a bond to the conventional order (Okada, 2011, p. 42) when fused together. It is stated that if the bond is strong, at that place atomic number 18 increased chances of prosocial behaviors and activities, whereas the opposite would mean that crime is more credibly to occur (Okada, 2011). Among the aspects relevant to the theory of the social bond which are attribute to the University of Chicago are the theories of social disorganization. These theories are the legacy of the University of Chicago (Okada, 2011, p. 42) for their section of Sociology is considered to be a sacred ground for Americas criminology. The g live began their studies on the city of Chicago, using the various data collected from people, places, and objects put together within the area. Without the numerous studies conducted regarding social disorganization by the University of Chicago, Hirschi would non take up been able to integrate the aspect of social organization to explain the elements of the social bond (Okada, 2011).Reinforcement and Punishment Reinforcement is referred to as an detail which occurs by and bywards a response and increases the frequence of said response. Reinforcement may both be decreed or negative positive reinforcement involves the display of an event that strengthens or increases the likelihood of a behavior (Kalat, 2008, p. 219). An example of positive reinforcement would be providing a nestling with food which he likes after the electric razor does a good deed such as clean his room. The positive reinforcement is the food which the child likes, and in order to take a crap this reinforcement, the child th en increases the behavior which helps him attain the desired outcome, which is cleaning his room (Kalat, 2008).A negative reinforcement, on the other hand, is also a ground level of reinforcement to increase a situation behavior however, the reinforcement is the absence of a particular event (Kalat, 2008). For example, a mother often nags her child to wash the dishes, the negative reinforcement is the nagging, and in order to avoid it, the child, in turn, washes the dishes.On the other hand, punishment occurs when a response is followed by an event such as pain (Kalat, 2008, p. 222) unlike reinforcement which aims to increase the frequency of a particular response, punishment involves decreasing the frequency of a particular response. Apart from this, punishment may either be an offset or an onset of something. An example of a punishment would be removing a childs allowance if his grades are bad (Kalat, 2008).Self-Control Theory and transgression The self-control theory states t hat poor child-rearing is the result of all forms of crime, for it leads to an individuals low self-control. It is stated that parents should be able to help their children establish a sense of self-control by the age of eight and if such is not done, this can leads to juvenile delinquency (Davies, 2008). One program which complements this theory is The Incredible historic period Parents, Teachers, and Children Training Series. This program is specifically designed for parents who have children with ages 3 to 12 it focuses on helping the parents improve their child-rearing skills, particularly their disciplinary and monitoring skills. Since parents are trained to discipline their child appropriately, this helps them help their children improve their self-control, thus, decreasing the chances of delinquency (Regoli, Hewitt, & DeLisi, 2011). ReferencesDavies, S.J. (2008). Security supervision and management The theory and practice of asset protection. Oxford Elsevier, Inc.Kalat, J .W. (2008). launching to psychology. California Thomson Wadsworth.Okada, D. (2011). Criminological theory and crime explanation. In M. Maguire & D. Okada (Eds.), Critical issues in crime and justice Thought, policy, and practice (31-46). California SAGE Publications, Inc.Regoli, R.M., Hewitt, J.D., & DeLisi, M. (2011). Delinquency in society The essentials. Massachusetts Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

No comments:

Post a Comment