Major Legislations Law in Australia

Question: Describe about the Major Legislations Law in Australia. Answer: Topic 3 Australian Trust Law The major legislations in Australia have been found to be inspired by many laws which have been made and speculated by the English people, yet the Australian laws have still found a ways to be not only effected but also majorly monopolized by indigenous Australian laws which are often of small scale but tend to convert their parent laws. The Trust law found in Australia has been a key example of this scenario, whereas it was predominately found to have much resemblance in structure with the English counterpart, it has been uniquely formulated over the years by keeping in mind the family and tax laws in the country. This law has two different constituents which is crucial to understand in order to place a critical analysis of the commercial side of this law. Explanation of the general trust law The general law which has been applicable in the country explains two very different entities involved in this scenario, the trustee and the beneficiary. The trustee as defined by the law is a person of interest which is defined as legal interests in a property which has been marked as a trust property by the estate. The beneficiary in this law sense is a person who has interest in the property which is defined as an interest of equity. The law simply commences as that if any person has an interest which is both equity and remains to be legal as well than the overall measure would provide that the equity interests would remain prevalent whereas it would also be under the ambit of being legal[1]. The case where many contradictions often arise in the country and thus the practice of this law becomes more practical is that the equity is often given by family members within their own families by nominating a trustee. This alone giving of equity to the trustee now allows him to make decis ion for the property and hence endows him with power control, the law therefore states that the trustee should abide by the trust and not make decision which seem to be an over use of his power and become unjust but rather abide by the law. According the ASICs repot of 2010, there are massive loop holes in the financial literacy of people living in Australia. Moreover, there is a huge element of mistrust amongst the people which lead them towards breach in the trust deeds. There has been a similar case from United States in 1988 when Charles Balkin tried to breach his friend when they were looking forward to invest in a land property. His friend, Don was a quite sensible about the financial terms and conditions so he decided to make an agreement with Charles as a trust deed. But Charles refused because he knew that according to Australian Trust Law, if someone breaches the law or agreement, he or she will be liable to face the legal consequences. Power transfers When there are different amounts of legal property and large assets involved, the rise of greed often shadows many ethical and moral grounds of people. The Law of Trustees states that the trustee of any appointed state or property can only be changed and appointed by the appointer of the state which in easier words is the owner. In the cases where owners pass away without nominating any kind of trustee for their property, the law enforces in these cases that the new appointers automatically become the ones that are in legal matters and close to the deceased. The new appointers now fully gain the power of hiring or removing trustees of the company or property. The Australian however allows the appointers to officially nominate themselves as the trustee of the property but these cases are rare and hence they require the nominators to officially make valid gifting and declare in writing about their decision[2]. These circumstances have been fairly rejected in many states around the worl d unless the person of interests shows both a written form of paper or declaration which incorporates the mutual consent of all parties. The transfer however has been recognized as a very complex arrangement because of the tights laws regulated by statute of frauds. The law promulgates that the transfer of a property to a trustee by the nominator or owner can be made when the owner formally files a declaration of transfer which is defined as being only legal and not equity. The careful precession of these words represents different terms and can even manipulate the transfer in itself. The transfer of the property to the trustee has to fulfill another condition which is that the owner himself has completely fulfilled all jurisdiction and formalities which are in regulations of the statute of frauds. The overall haul in the entire procedures of these trust properties are often catalyzed by investment or the common cases of people becoming greedy. The property cases which have been emerging in the country since ages have involved many conflicts between the beneficiaries of the trust and the trustee[3]. Many people have over the years forgotten about how when they are appointed as the trustee of any properties, there are different facets and rules which a trustee must abide by. The first rule which comes into play after the appointment of power is that the trustee is ideally held liable for all the property and the loss of investment in that property, he has specific duties which need to be filled such as proper care of the property. The conflicts which many beneficiaries have with trustee even though of the situation that they hold equity in the property and the law basically ties the hands of the trustee, there are still some moral grounds and limitations to the equity holders su ch as many people often are unaware of the fact that what the trustee is actually up to when catering to the trust. There are no legal constraints which allow the trustee to release the official information to the beneficiary and the same case applies to the counterpart, these systems are solely operated on the basis of trust and effective relationship between both parties. The affiliations with becoming the trustee of any property require quick planning and the innate sense of responsibility towards the property itself. The case often arises when the property starts to lose its market value because of the influx of either real estate problems or the economic issue in the country, in these cases the entire responsibility depends on the trustee who has been appointed by the owner and he is completely liable to make suitable changes to the property which can make remedial action for these properties, these situation also can shift the property towards different companies as well as pr ivate company owners. Festivities involving trust properties When the family trusts are often discussed there are a number of different festivities that often get involved while considering both the beneficiaries and the trustees themselves. The discretional property trusts often work in different ways than other trusts found in Australia. The trusts have been idealized and initiated mainly in different families where members are elected to be either of the both discretional trustees or the beneficiary, the main line which divides these both of these entities is the sources of power and the capability of having different stakes in the trust property them. The trustee in these cases holds the most powerful wand of control of the property which has been given to him on the basis of legal terms, this makes them in complete control of the finances involved in the entire property and makes them even renting out or selling these properties to any other client. The Australian Trust Law restricts the discretional beneficiaries form benefiting only on the basis of their equity claims but rather they are restricted by the trustee themselves. The only fitting way which allows for the beneficiaries can benefit from their property while considering the existence of the trustee is that if the trustee only allows the beneficiary to benefit from all the finances involved in the property. This alone in power in these types of decisions is the law in the country which allows for these trustees to mutually benefit from the inheritance and also helps the trustees to become more easy and flexible in controlling the entire property. Many cases have spurned from different angles which have shown that many trustees falling into the ambiguities of controlling their own property which has been appointed to them with the law and hence have been known to be reported to the supreme court for further assistance, this has relinquished the trust of many people in the trust and therefore makes valid claims about how the trustee was officially appointed by the family can make initial decisions which might seem often ambiguous. In the years that have followed many steps have been taken into account of using the transfer policies which can maintain for the trustees while changing an appointing the new beneficiaries of the trust, this alone step has caused different problems in the properties as reported by many people, these problems which has caused new beneficiaries to compete for the new power control and this has led to many claims by both parties since the law provides the beneficiaries with equity and the trustees with the power of legal claims. Careful precessions have been taken into account when referring to the transfer of these properties to different owners under the discretion trusts and family rules. These problems have often causes many property owners in the country to resort to schemes which would allow for less harm on both the property reputation and the property investment plans in the country. Many people or how the law calls them as the nominators of the property have made attempts into making different private companies as the trustee of their properties, this not only intestates a positive step towards the property but also makes different accounts into solving out the dispute claims in these properties[4]. This has been made possible because the law states that when the commercial company owners are made the trustees of any properties the property becomes safe when the even the official trustee on the contract or lease papers passes away this still makes the companies to remain intact of the property and be the official trustee of the company because the company still remains under the same ambit of its existence. The only case which makes them difficult in different cases is when the company owners change but that still makes the company entirely liable to the trust property; however when the company however begins on the journey of either being completely void or being shut down. The nature of this condition than allows the company to openly make active decisions and resort to different means of hiring a new trustee for the property. The difference between companies operated trustee and the natural trustees of the residential sectors however yet defines other paradigms which can make the owners be on other verges. The natural owners or law appointed trustees can make the changes to the property until and unless they are held liable when they are alive, but when these trustees pass away the conflict often arises in the cases of unsafe properties or in the cases of properties where more than one beneficiary are in collaboration with each other. The applicable rule for the trust property still remains the same but however the principle of liability changes due to the fact of the trustee type. The main conflict between trusties often also arises when the property undergoes different issues such as the property being suffered a loss in its repute or income value. Thi s situations has been catered by the trustees themselves by altering the trust deed which puts the trustees in debt of investing all the trust funds which are received by them for the investment and betterment of the property, however many trustees have made the claims for altering this very clause by stating the reason that these property values often result in dead investment plans and often makes them incapable of appointing any other investors in this case. This law has however been refined to support the legal owners of these properties to make their trust funds investments in many other property options which give them the different opportunities to have other income supports. All these festivities involve different things in these property reviews and these cases have made different acquisitions over the years also involving the commercial side of these properties and in different cases when the trustees automatically become entitled to breach their own contracts and trust de ed while facing commercial investments and property investment plans[5]. Commercial property involving trustees The residential approaches to the trust properties depending on the laws and regulations narrate out a different story rather than the private and commercial ones. The commercial property owners however have different approaches towards these trust issues and can execute different variable law schemes between both the beneficiaries and the company appointed trustee of these companies. The hub of attraction between different things which has attracted many former new clients which are known as creditors and these people are also known as the third parties which are involved in the exercise of these trust companies to make different investment and expecting their financial charts to either boost up or probably go down because of the below explained reasons[6]. The reason why these companies known as creditors are involved in investing in the commercial trust properties is that these companies hold viable investment opportunities as well as the solicited owners of these commercial prope rties such as the trustee who is only liable in making the deal come true with the creditors whereas the official appointed beneficiaries of the company who can only benefit on all the profits earned by the company without having an entire legal say in which the company would operate. This allows the creditors to make decision depending on their liking and hence obtain these properties which are often none protected at a subsidized price which is comparatively much less than the official market of having other companies which are not under the ambit of trusts. There are different levels of different problems which can be affiliated with the nominating parties and the company owners which deal with these trust properties[7]. This makes the risk of having owned a debt incorporated company to the maximum limits because there are no official signs of these records of the company in the files or in any of the documents which have been made public to the audiences or the creditor company owners or different websites which the foreign investors might want to look up. These problems have been fairly narrated by different people in the past and have been dealt by the government in ways which are only prosecuted on the trustees self-morals of when he declares that the company which is being vested by these creditors is a trust owned company under a very viable trust deed. The official procedure for these kinds of interactions forms when the company is being invested by the creditors, the documents formulated often involve different things, one of th ese things involve the companys financial records and bank statements whereas the declaration of these companies as a trust unit or a non-trust unit with a trustee. This step is crucial in these transactions because it enables for the creditors in making active profit from the company without having to pay of the debts of the company or having to fulfill the mouths of all beneficiaries. Hence it is the moral code of conduct and the liability of any trustee to assure the creditors about the legal standing of the company so that the creditors may not suffer the loss of their entire investments[8]. When the cases arrive when creditors find out that the company which have been operated by these trusts have been filed for different debts possessions than the law permits the trustees to make different claims and their legal standings in the Australian court of law allows the trustees to simply pull themselves out of the matter by claiming themselves only the trustees and therefore this ma tter to be resolved by simply removing them because in the end they cannot control the assets of the financial matters of the trust owned companies. Further affiliations and problems The different impacts which can cause problems for the creditors when investing in these non-secured companies by the trust affiliations can cause different amounts of problems for these creditors[9]. The different cases of debts arrival however can be solved by the Australian law of indemnity which has been providing these trustees. The simple procedure of this clause makes it easy for the investors who have been involved in these companies as it allows that the trustee can access all the beneficiary assets of the companies which can provide the official amount which is needed to escape these problems, however these beneficiaries budgets can help to move the company towards prosperity and help the companies to solve out the issues however this only becomes possible when the trustees dont wish to use the assets to just pay off the debts of the companies whereas if in the cases of these companies many trustees have over the years been involved in the breaching of their trust deeds by actively participating them in the concept of using these funds for their personal issues and uses whereas by showing the company under debt. Breaching of the trust deed There are many reasons to why the trust deeds has been breached by different trustees of these commercial properties and hence when the company has been found to be under debt due to the actions of the trustees themselves, this further allows the official appointed beneficiaries of the company to sale the assets without the involvement of the trustee and this further allows the beneficiaries to modify the trust deed so that the remedial actions can be implemented and hence sort out the problems faced by the commercial company[10]. We have seen in the past when Brady Price, the owner of Brad Food Company in NSW tried to breach the term agreement of trust by stating that there are no debts on the property but at the time of selling the property, he found guilty for breaching the trust deed with the other party. Conclusion The overall conclusion of this critical analysis between the company and different trustee owners is that overall inclusion of these companies affiliated with trust promotes more risk than other non-trust companies, although the tangible benefits of acquiring these companies which are affiliated with trusts seem more profitable to the owners in both benefits and profit returns, This also allows for the company to deal in many other countries on different prices and the only efficient way of imposing this effective rule is that the imposition of a written proof of a companys statement of either being in a trust or not.